Join ConsumerLoginDonate
  • Consumer NZ
  • About us
  • Consumer rights and advice
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Media releases
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Community guidelines
  • Contact us
  • Membership
  • Join
  • Membership support
  • Consumer magazine
  • Consumer Advice Line
  • Top tests and reviews
  • Other sites
  • Campaigns
  • Stop misleading supermarket pricing
  • Fix the broken electricity market
  • Sign the flight rights petition
  • Stamp out scams
  • Right to repair
  • End greenwashing now

Follow us

© Copyright Consumer NZ. All rights reserved.

Sunscreens now have to comply with a mandatory standard

6 September 2022

On Thursday 8 September, the Sunscreen (Product Safety Standard) Act became law. Sunscreens are now regulated under the Fair Trading Act (FTA) and it is mandatory for products to meet the Australian and New Zealand sunscreen standard. Companies that breach the requirements face fines of up to $600,000.

Consumer NZ Chief Executive Jon Duffy said while this is good news for the public, Consumer believes regulating sunscreens under the FTA should only be an interim measure. The organisation wants sunscreens regulated as a therapeutic product (not a cosmetic), which would bring New Zealand in line with Australia.

“Complying with the standard also isn’t enough,” he said. “Sunscreens need to be tested regularly to ensure different batches provide the claimed protection, which the standard doesn’t require. Consumer has been testing sunscreens for many years and finds companies are sometimes relying on tests that are several years old to support their label claims.”

Sunscreen company pleads guilty after Consumer NZ complaint

Australian skincare company Ego Pharmaceuticals has pleaded guilty to two charges under the Fair Trading Act, for making unsubstantiated label claims on two sunscreens.

The guilty plea comes after the Commerce Commission opened an investigation following a Consumer NZ complaint. The complaint was that Ego Sunsense Sensitive Invisible SPF50+ and Ego Sunsense Ultra SPF50+ failed to provide the very high protection claimed. In Consumer’s independent testing in 2018 and 2019, both products only provided moderate protection.

Duffy said at the time of testing, Ego Pharmaceuticals provided Consumer with test results showing the sunscreens met their claimed SPF.

“Both certificates were from AMA Laboratories – a sunscreen-testing facility in the US,” Duffy said. “In 2021, the owner of AMA admitted defrauding customers and causing sunscreens to be marketed on the basis of false lab reports.”

Duffy said he’s pleased with the outcome.

“For many years, companies sent us test reports from AMA Labs when our tests found they weren’t up to standard.”

The case is now before the courts and sentencing is scheduled for 26 October.


We can't do this without you.

Consumer NZ is independent and not-for-profit. We depend on the generous support of our members and donors to keep us fighting for a better deal for all New Zealanders. Donate today to support our work.

Donate


Comments

Get access to comment
Join Consumer
Log in

Was this page helpful?

Related articles

Nandos promo

Backlash to misleading delivery fees at Nando's

26 August 2022
Kathmandu’s BioDown jacket.

Is Kathmandu greenwashing? 'Biodegradable' jacket ad pulled after complaint

August 2022
sunscreen bottle with SPF numbers

Sunscreens

Updated December 2025